Sustainweb
Home  >  News  >  Real Bread Campaign  >  Real Bread Campaign shocked by Allinson advert ASA ruling 
Real Bread Campaign news
Recent Real Bread Campaign news items
Real Bread Maker Week: Raising dough to do good! - 03/04/2013
A wholegrain of truth? - 27/02/2013
Free Real Bread workshop to mark Lessons in Loaf success - 20/11/2012

Visit the Real Bread Campaign homepage, or follow the links below to other pages from this project
Real Bread Finder
About Real Bread
Campaign news
Additives & labels
Miscellaneous
FAQs
Events
Membership
Bakers support
Home baking
Community & public sector
Schools
Sourdough
Links and books
Real Bread publications
Contact us
Real Bread Campaign shocked by Allinson advert ASA ruling
19/09/2012

Today the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) rejected a complaint by the Real Bread Campaign that certain marketing of Allinson brand loaves was misleading.

A central element of the complaint made on 26 April 2012 about a print advertisement for Allinson brand wrapped-sliced factory loaves are photographs of hands kneading dough and an unwrapped, unsliced loaf, placed directly under a bold, green headline ‘ALLINSON TODAY’.

Campaign coordinator Chris Young said: ‘We’re utterly shocked.  The ASA claims that it “is here to make sure all advertisements are legal, decent, honest and truthful.” In what way is using photographs of hand-made bread to advertise an industrial product untouched by human hand during its manufacture in any way honest or truthful? If consumers and small, independent local businesses can’t trust the ASA to protect them from misleading advertising, where can they turn?’

Professor Gerard Hastings, Director of Institute for Social Marketing Stirling University, and the Open University, said: ‘The aim is to build into the brand of ‘Allinson today’ the image of a traditional bakery, which in fact bears no resemblance to the reality of the industrial production methods actually used.'

Chris Hackley, Professor of Marketing at Royal Holloway University of London, added: ‘Advertisers know very well that implied meanings are powerful, even if they are not literally believed by consumers.’

The Campaign is also concerned that the process took so long – only a week short of five months – to conclude. Other elements of Allinson’s marketing the Campaign believes to be misleading include:

A pure heart?
The advertisement makes reference to the ‘…pure whole grain flour at the heart of an Allinson loaf,’ despite the arteries of this wholewheat flour ‘heart’ being clogged by many unnecessary extras including mono- and diglycerides of fatty acids (E471), mono- and diacetyl tartaric acid esters of mono- and diglycerides of fatty acids (E472e aka DATEM), ascorbic acid (E300), vegetable oil, vinegar, molasses, and sugar. [1]

100% wholemeal?
To produce Allinson loaves wholemeal flour is mixed with soya flour; highly-refined powdered wheat protein; malted barley flour; and oat bran. Given that section 6 of The Bread and Flour Regulations 1998 states: ‘There shall not be used in the labelling or advertising of bread, as part of the name of the bread, whether or not qualified by other words, the word ‘wholemeal’ unless all the flour used as an ingredient in the preparation of the bread is wholemeal.’ [2] [our italics], we believe that the use of the word ‘wholemeal’ in the product’s name and marketing breaches this regulation.

Still has no artificial preservatives?
The advertisement claims that the product ‘still has no artificial preservatives,’ even though Allison brand loaves contain the artificial additive DATEM, a function of which is to slow staling. The Campaign asks how making such a claim about a product made with a synthetic substance used to prolong the appearance of freshness is anything other than misleading.

The word ‘still’ implies that Allinson brand loaves have always been free of artificial preservatives, even though we understand that previous formulations for Allinson loaves contained the preservative calcium propionate. Notwithstanding the DATEM issue, we believe the use of the word ‘still’ is an element of the advertisement’s unjustifiable allusion to an unbroken link with Dr. Allinson that simply does not exist.

In whose name?
The advertisement concludes that Thomas Allinson’s ‘…spirit for healthy eating lives on in everything we make.’ Allinson brand loaves are manufactured using flour produced by high-speed steel rollers. Roller milling is a process to which Dr. Allinson objected so much that in 1892 he bought a stone mill in order to make more stoneground flour available to more people. [3] He was a man who said that, ‘When ground, nothing must be taken from it, nor must anything be added to the flour, and from this bread should be made.’[4] How can an advert for loaves manufactured with roller milled flours, plus a litany of unnecessary ingredients and artificial additives, state with any validity that the spirit of such a fervent whole foods advocate lives on in these products made by a totally unrelated company?

The full complaint, ruling and guest blog post from Professor Hackley can be found in the Campaign News section of realbreadcampaign.org

ENDS

For more information please contact Chris Young: chris [at] sustainweb.org or 020 7837 1228
www.realbreadcampaign.org       twitter.com/realbread     facebook.com/realbreadcampaign

Notes

[1] Alinson Wholemeal Batch Loaf, company website allinsonbread.com/wholemeal-batch-loaf.html, retrieved 11 September 2012
[2] The Bread and Flour Regulations 1998  legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1998/141/made, retrieved 11 September 2012
[3]  Watts, M. Milling and Millwrighting. London. SPAB (Mills Section) 1983 (revised 2000) craftsintheenglishcountryside.org.uk/pdfs/Millwrighting.pdf, retrieved 11 September 2012
[4] Allinson, T. The Allinson Vegetarian Cookery Book [a.k.a Dr. Allinson’s Cookery Book]. London. Natural Food Company 1915 gutenberg.org/files/13887/13887-h/13887-h.htm, retrieved 26 April 2012

Key initiatives from the Real Bread Campaign include: